CDFA Measurement Verification Practice Exam – Practice Test, Study Guide & Prep

In this scenario, the admissibility of the evidence found inside the cabinet hinges primarily on the concept of consent and the expectations of privacy. When permission to enter a private residence is granted by an adult, generally, that consent allows law enforcement or other authorized individuals to conduct a search of the premises, including areas where it is reasonable to expect evidence may be found.

However, the specific mention of hiding places, like a cabinet, introduces nuances regarding expectation of privacy. If a particular location, such as a cabinet, is deemed a space where a person could reasonably conceal themselves, it suggests that the occupant has a legitimate privacy interest in that space. This implies that a search of that area may require additional justification beyond mere permission to enter the home, since consent doesn’t automatically extend to every concealed or private area within a residence.

Thus, the correctness of the answer lies in emphasizing that the reasonableness of expectations concerning the cabinet is crucial. If the entirety of the situation leads to the understanding that a cabinet could reasonably serve as a hiding place, this creates a boundary for the search related to the consent given, making the further exploration of that space more questionable unless specific conditions justify it.

The other options lack the necessary understanding of the implications of consent